Case · Mental health sector · 2025–2026

Aligning CRM processes across several independent organisations

Three organisations, one shared CRM: understanding how each of them works before choosing the tool, then following the implementation through to go-live.

Role
Business analyst
Period
2025–2026
Organisations
3 independent organisations
Delivered
Requirements, user stories, test scenarios

The challenge

Three independent organisations in the mental health sector decided to build a shared digital ecosystem. Each kept its own autonomy, but all three needed more structure and better alignment in how they tracked their activities.

Three organisations, three ways of working. Each had its own habits, priorities and terminology for describing the same process. Before choosing a tool, the first step was to understand what each team actually did and where the common ground was.

The friction points at the start

  • Friction 01

    Three ways of working

    Each organisation had its own habits and priorities for the same process.

  • Friction 02

    Different terminology

    The same steps went by different names from one team to the next.

  • Friction 03

    Autonomy to preserve

    The shared model could not erase what made each organisation specific.

The approach

The work began by listening to the three teams, first separately and then together. Each need was translated into a clear requirement and documented so it could be understood by everyone, from the people doing the work to management.

The scope of the CRM implementation was defined on that shared foundation. User stories and test scenarios were written around the real usage of all three organisations, not just the simplest scenario.

Stakeholder coordination remained a constant throughout the project, with regular validation points so that each organisation could remain confident in the direction being taken.

  • Business analysis
  • CRM
  • Governance

What was delivered

  • Documented requirements

    Each need translated into a clear requirement, understandable from the people doing the work to management.

  • CRM implementation scope

    Defined on the common ground of all three organisations.

  • User stories and test scenarios

    Written around the real usage of all three organisations, not just the simplest scenario.

The result

The external partner implemented the solution under continuous functional oversight and validation. The existing tools were migrated to the new solution, with a go-live strategy designed for all three organisations at once.

What the project made possible

  • One shared solution

    Implemented by the external partner, under continuous functional oversight and validation.

  • Existing tools migrated

    The previous tools were moved into the new solution.

  • A joint go-live

    A strategy designed for all three organisations at once.

Key takeaways

This project shows what makes the difference in a multi-organisation transformation.

  1. Understand before choosing

    Taking the time to understand each way of working before choosing a tool.

  2. Document for everyone

    Needs written so they stay understandable to everyone, from the teams to management.

  3. Stay aligned to the end

    Keeping stakeholders aligned through to go-live, not just at the start.

Is one of your processes eating up your time? The Process Scan gives you a first reading in 5 minutes, free. Take the Process Scan →

Three organisations can share a CRM without working in the same way

If several teams or organisations need to share a CRM environment while keeping their own way of working, I can help define the common ground.